Source-based reviews
We examine published platform, account and product information and explain practical differences. Every current review identifies its source and reference date. Review scope is visible on the page. We do not claim live account testing, verified customer experiences or measured average spreads unless those activities have actually been performed.
Directory profiles
Profiles with pending verification retain useful historical context or provider-supplied information. They are labelled as profiles and do not receive a safety rating. A profile is a starting point for further checks, not a recommendation to deposit money.
No invented scores
We currently publish qualitative assessments. There are no synthetic star ratings, fabricated trader testimonials or unmeasured execution statistics. Platform availability and group-level regulation must not be mistaken for the protections of a specific account.
News and guides
Our news covers broker announcements, programme changes and regulatory developments. Articles link to original sources and distinguish provider claims from independent findings. AI-assisted articles are labelled. Source dates and article update dates are shown so readers can judge how current the information is.
Changing terms
Guides explain the conditions that matter when comparing firms. Terms, eligibility and product availability can change; always check the current documents for the specific programme, legal entity and country. Historical articles are marked as archives.
Commercial independence
Sponsored placements are separate and labelled. Payment purchases visibility, not an editorial verdict, licence check or endorsement. Affiliate links use our original destination map and carry an appropriate disclosure.
Corrections
If a fact, link or programme rule has changed, contact info@fx.reviews with the page URL and an original source. We correct the underlying data so the change appears wherever that information is used.